As
members of an academic community which places a high value on truth and
the pursuit of knowledge, Saint Leo University Students are expected to
be honest in every phase of their academic life and to present as their
own work only that which is genuinely theirs. Unless otherwise specified
by the professor, students must complete homework assignments by
themselves (or, if on a team assignment, with only their team members).
If they receive outside assistance of any kind, they are expected to
cite the source of that assistance and indicate the extent of the
assistance. Each student has the responsibility to maintain the highest
standards of academic integrity and to refrain from cheating,
plagiarism, or any other form of academic dishonesty.Academic
dishonesty is representing another’s work as one’s own, active
complicity in such falsification, or violating test conditions.
Plagiarism is stealing and passing off the ideas and words of another as
one’s own or using the work of another without crediting the source.
Saint Leo University will hold students responsible for safeguarding
their work against plagiarism by others. For example, papers left on
hard drives or floppy disks are easily copied, and when two or more
students submit papers that are essentially the same, it is often
impossible to determine which version was written first and which was
plagiarized. In cases of this nature the actions of both students will
be reviewed by the committee and appropriate sanctions may be awarded to
one or all students.
Questions of academic honesty are of great importance to Saint Leo
University. Infractions are addressed by the office of Academic Affairs.
When there is a reason to suspect that a student has violated either
the University’s policy on academic honesty or the classroom
instructor’s specific codes as outlined in the course syllabus, the
faculty member must, in person and, if possible, in private, discuss the
charges and evidence with the student.
Without taking any punitive action, the faculty member will submit a
report, in writing, as soon as possible to the Academic Standards
Committee for the home campus or the Resident Center Director in the
School of Continuing Education. The report of the faculty member will
normally include these points:
1. The faculty member’s charge against the student;
2. The evidence supporting the faculty member’s charge.
3. A summary of the discussion between the student and the faculty
member, including any admissions or denial of guilt on the part of the
student.
Upon receipt of the instructor’s report, the Academic Standards
Committee or an ad hoc committee appointed by the Resident Center
Director will schedule a hearing and inform the student, in writing, of
the date and time of the hearing. The Committee will also enclose copies
of the faculty member’s report. A student is not permitted to withdraw
from a course while the infraction is under investigation. The student
is required to attend the hearing. If the student does not attend the
hearing, the committee will render a default judgment with appropriate
sanctions.
After reviewing the evidence and hearing the argument of both
parties, the Committee will render a decision on the charge and
determine any sanctions which are appropriate.
The sanctions for academic dishonesty, such as cheating on an
examination, plagiarism, forgery of academic documents (including
signing another’s name), the copying of computer programs or
information, and similar offenses, are as follows:
1. The minimum sanction for the first offense is an "F" for the test
of assignment, but the usual sanction is an "F" in the course in which
the violation took place. No provision can be made for the student to
receive a "W."
2. The minimum sanction for the second offense is an "F" in the
course, but the usual sanction is suspension of the student from Saint
Leo University.
Circumstances which would justify sanctions greater than the minimum
include the students previous academic and disciplinary record at the
University or the particularly flagrant nature of the offense.
The campus student will be afforded an opportunity to appeal the
decisions of the committee to the Vice President for Academic Affairs.
The Vice President for Academic Affairs may accept or modify any
finding, conclusion, or suggested sanction in the recommended decision
and issue the final decision of the University as soon as practical. The
final authority rests with the Vice President for Academic Affairs.
It is the responsibility and obligation of each student personally to
uphold the Academic Honor Code. Students are required to report any
observed instance of academic dishonesty to the faculty member.